Monday, March 3, 2014


Texas Hold'em: Betting Against Poverty
 
 

 





-By Amy Souza



Poverty. This is an issue that plagues the nation. Enliven Foundation is fighting to give those in poverty a chance to better their lives for themselves and their families. Enliven Foundation is in the business of equipping and empowering parents to achieve personal and academic success by providing practical needs, academic guidance, and emotional support.





In 2010 15.1 percent-46.2 million Americans-lived in poverty. In the last half of the century there came a growing trend that is called the feminization of poverty. Homes that are headed by single women make up over half of all poor families as of 2010. This is over 23 million single mothers fighting to provide a better life for their children; mothers that are in the welfare system and trying to get governmental aid in their attempt to stay afloat in their hard times. The system is set up to help single mothers receive food stamps and cash assistance to help these women and their families stay off the streets. There is, however, a glitch in the system. The people who receive cash assistance, or TANF, have requirements put on them by the system which calls for them to attend 20+ hours a week on certain job searches or job preparation classes. If someone was going to take on a full term credit load and is working a part time job, there is not enough hours in a day to meet the TANF requirements, therefore they are kicked off of cash assistance and left to use all their financial resources and remain in the same state of poverty.



Our vision is to provide a home for these women and their children by purchasing a multi-unit complex that will be rent free while one is attending college, and will also provide educational and emotional guidance while they earn their degree. This is where YOU come in!



Enliven Foundation is having a Texas Hold'em Poker tournament on March 15th at 7:00 pm with registration beginning at 6:00 pm. It is being held at the Lebanon Elks Lodge. We are hosting this tournament in an attempt to raise the funds for the legal fees to pay for the 501(c)3 non-profit organization status needed to begin our foundation. If you are interested in attending this tournament you can per-register on our website at www.enlivenfoundation.org . Here you can also learn more about our vision, goals, and if you feel led, you can also give donations through this website. When you pre-register for the tournament on our website you will be given extra chips on the night of the fundraiser. Please note there is a 5 dollar cover charge for all those who are not playing in the tournament, this charge will cover a free slice of pizza and one free soda. To add to the excitement that evening, we will also be holding a 50/50 raffle. There will be a bar at the Elks Lodge serving drinks that evening as well. We at Enliven Foundation want to thank you in advance for supporting our vision. 


Thursday, August 8, 2013

APPLE: It's More Than a Product, It's a Lifestyle!


APPLE: It’s More Than a Product, It’s a Lifestyle!

iPads, iPods, MacBooks, Apple Computers; this is one of the hottest brand names in America.  We have all succumb to an Apple nation.  We love the image we carry when we become an Apple user!  We love the feeling of seeing these colorful, freeing ads plastered all over our cities and know that we belong to this subculture, this ideology to “think different”.  It’s amazing the power that apple has in our society, and how well the company has prospered since they stopped selling computers, and started selling a lifestyle. 

The ad I am going to be discussing was a series that began in 2003 and was called the silhouette style.  This started out as commercials of black silhouettes against a brightly colored backdrop, the colors depicted was the famous Apple rainbow colors.  After this campaigns success, we have seen billboards, posters, ads in magazines and on the internet of these silhouettes.  I believe this ad campaign completely changed Apple.  This was when the company tapped into American culture and started selling a new ideology; A new identity for its consumers.  It started selling the apple lifestyle. 

The interesting thing about this ad is its chameleon tendency when using different styles to reach different customers.  There is a bandwagon persuasive technique that is put into play when you see this ad. You are looking at every other American that values individuality and purpose.  That is why the silhouettes are so effective. There is no famous person to tag in these ads, just normal people who all appear to be free from life while listening to their iPod.  And, of course, if everybody else is doing this, well, you should have an iPod also.  However, there is also a very strong snob appeal.  Like I said, Apple is no longer just a brand, it’s a lifestyle.  Apple is the high end iPod, it’s the expensive, full proof laptop.  Apple is not cheap! So it is linked to the “yuppie” lifestyle.  It is amazing that this one ad covers so much ground as far as its appeal to its consumers.  The silhouettes themselves are an effective use of the association principle, I think.  They link the product (iPod), with the idea of freedom and happiness.  Notice none of these silhouettes seem to be sad or restricted by any social standards. They are the outline of a young person unhindered by anything.  Apple took this ad to every medium, and it was effective in every area. 

Now, when we look at the target audience, it is easy to see that the silhouettes are not middle aged men and women but rather young adults.  However, the way the silhouettes were used to depict so many different styles and even races was great.  You can tell by looking at the silhouettes that it is aiming for men and women, sleek and punk, classy and grunge.  The silhouettes are so well done, that you can find yourself in one of them, or at least relate to the image you wished you carried in one of the silhouettes.  And even though these ads covered many different styles, there is nothing offensive about any style they are trying to show.  Each style is shown as accepted and encouraged as the next.  That is what makes this ad campaign stand out.  The target audience is really anyone who wants to feel as free and content in themselves as these dancing silhouettes are feeling.  This is a whole new strategy that covers far more than the ads that lead up to this. 

This ad is very strong in the way it can target a wide variety demographics, but some of its weakness could fall in the idea that this freedom does not sell as well to the older, retired generation.  Now, I believe that apple is still popular among this older generation; I am just saying this ad campaign in particular may not appeal to that generation.  But the diversity of the black silhouette against the brightly colored backdrop made this ad stand out and get noticed very easily.  There was not a lot for the viewer to take in.  The idea was simply given in two colors which left little to be digested and gone through.  It was a message that was simply put, and loud and clear.   Today, thirteen years after the first silhouette campaign, most of the population can associate these ads with Apple products without even thinking.  Apple owned its ad, and it is still burned into our memories.

I am a devout Apple consumer.  I have the iPhone, the iPad, and once I start at OSU, I will be the proud owner of a Macbook, so I can bring a biased opinion to the table.  But after doing some research it was clear that there is a definite split in the market of Apple products. You either are an Apple user, or you are not.  You either own the lifestyle and ideology, or you hate it.  I know that my own father despises Apple and everything they stand for.  He tells me I am selling myself to the yuppie liberals when I buy their products. And isn’t that the biggest complaint?  Apple haters will tell us all day long how apple monopolizes the market and takes advantage of its customers by overpricing their products, and they say we are buying the apple image, not just the product.  OF COURSE WE ARE!  That should be a testament to how well Apple’s ads have been.  We want that freedom, we want that ideology, we want to be the yuppie liberals because that means we are set apart from the mundane. We have our own identity within the Apple subculture.  And frankly, based on this ad alone, I would buy into the Apple way of life.  It has all the appeal with none of the drawbacks.  Not only would I buy it, but I would recommend it to others.  This is a solid company that has successfully broken into society as brought more than just a product.  And that deserves a little recognition.


Here are some links I found interesting regarding Apple:

http://www.cultofmac.com/172428/why-does-apple-inspire-so-much-hate/

http://www.pastemagazine.com/blogs/lists/2013/06/5-products-that-give-apple-a-rotten-name.html

http://www.apple.com/

Thursday, July 18, 2013

Television as a Cultural Mirror



The American society has been on a spinning wheel of change since it began with the signing of the Declaration of Independence.  The constant change is what keeps people wanting to be a part of this culture that we have created.  When turning on prime time television we are bombarded with many different shows that will play into our need for “guilty pleasures” or will fulfill our desire for more information on current events.  We can choose a light comedy like “How I Met Your Mother” or a risqué show that taps into our sexual inhibitions like “The L-Word” or “Nip/Tuck”.  We can choose between real news like Fox or CNN, or we can turn on comedy central for a lighter version of the news by watching The Colbert Report or The Daily Show with John Daily. 

With all of these shows, it seems that every arena has been covered.  But I am interested in discuss an episode of the overnight success show called “Glee”.  This show has taken on part of the responsibility of re-socializing our upcoming generation by choosing to boldly take on the subject matter that has been left in the background as far as prime time television.  Now, this is, by no means, a political show that was created to cater to Capitol Hill and its followers; but it has taken the difficult subjects like spousal abuse, teenage sexuality, teen pregnancy, stereotypes, and bullying and applied them in a way that the younger generation can grab a
hold and begin to form their own opinions rather than carrying their parents or grandparents values and beliefs.

I am going to be discussing an episode of Glee titled ‘The First Time’.
  It was aired on November 8th.  This episode confronted a huge “phobia” that today's society has against gay men.  It confronted not only the idea of a relationship between two gay men, but it actually depicted a gay couple losing their virginity with one another.  This is both ground breaking and controversial.  As much as I would like to say that the American society has let go of its homophobic nature, it absolutely has not.  This episode, I believe, was an attempt to portray a normal rite of passage in the life of two gay teenagers, but more than that, it was an attempt to begin to remove the stigma that follows gay men around as far as a sexual relationship.  Lesbian women do not have this stigma that follows them around as much as gay men do.  It is much safer for a network to air a kiss or sexual experimentation between two women than it does two men.  This was a risky show to air.  But the conformation it gave to the GLBT community far outweighed its negative reviews. 

In this episode, Kurt Hummel, played by Chris Colfer and his boyfriend Blaine Anderson , played by Darren Criss, lost their virginity with each other.  The plot followed Kurt and Blaine along with Rachel Berry, played by Lea Michele and her boyfriend Finn Hudson, played by Cory Monteith, on their road to their first sexual experience.  The episode is primarily focused around these two couples and followed along as they fought internally and externally about the idea of losing their virginity.  A sub-plot of this episode was about the glee club getting ready for their play “West Side Story”.  Kurt and Blaine were up against the fact that their relationship had left the initial high and fiery stage, and was going through a more dull and boring stage.  Kurt struggles with the idea that Blaine is thinking he is boring, and Blaine is making sure Kurt is comfortable and feels like he isn’t being pushed into anything. 
The end of the episode goes back and forth between the two couples in the midst of their first sexual experience.  One of the last scenes it shows Blaine lying behind Kurt in bed and they are smiling at each other.  After that, it shows Rachel lying on top of Finn.  These scenes were letting the audience now that both couples had had sex.

After analyzing this show and this episode particularly, I came to see that not only was this show promoting many different styles and stereotypes, but it is a political platform that is ushering in a new perspective on very hot topics. It has a character that fits almost every stereotype imaginable to its target high school audience.  There is the jock Finn, the overachiever and star reacher Rachel, the dumb blonde Brittany, the popular Latino bitch Santana, the brilliant and pressured Asian, the handicapped, the punk, the fat girl that nobody likes, etc.  It has also given new portrayals of old stereotypes for teens to identify with.  There is the stereotypical gay man who is into high fashion and fits in better with the ladies, but there is also a “man’s man” who is gay.  A real Frank Sinatra kind of guy.  This is reaching out to the gay men that don’t identify with Kurt, the more feminine gay man.  The show is filmed and on a set in a controlled environment, but has stepped outside of that to film on location in New York.  By filming on set, they really capture the drama of the show in the control they have over the lighting and the shots they are able to get.  It adds to the quality of the show.  Glee is the same as a lot of other shows that are aimed at the 16-24 aged audience, meaning that it has the cast dressed in latest trends and hairstyles and includes drama that every day teens would encounter. But it is also different in the sense that it is trying to change the views that have traditionally been set with the problems these teens are dealing with.  Its most powerful hook would be the fact that it uses popular songs of today and past hits and has the cast perform these songs throughout the entire show.  It’s a musical that never ends.  This is a powerful draw for teens. 

This show is a perfect example of how the values of society or the desired values of society can be mirrored and expressed in the media.  The episode I am referring to, The First Time is a representation of the ideology that a gay relationship is no different than that of a man and woman.  It shows that there can be just as much love and intimacy in a relationship between two men as there is within the traditional relationship.  This is the opinion of many liberal and democratic voices in the house. This past June, a new policy came into play in the government that recognizes marriages between gay and lesbian couples.  This was a decision that had been put off and fought against over and over.  Glee used their ability to reach a young generation of voters to help sway the population into this new way of thinking. 

I read some reviews of this episode by various critics.  What struck me as odd is the fact that not a lot of people noted this very big moment!  Of course the gay and lesbian community were happy, but the general critics didn’t have much to say.  One a website called Monkeys as Critics, Ryan McGee said, ““The First Time” is less about two couples having sex for the first time and more about self-acceptance.”  I am wondering if this storyline was less of a shock and venture into a new world of acceptance to critics than average Americans? Another critic named James Poniewozik said on Times Entertainment’s web page, “Right up front, let me say that “The First Time” was the best episode, overall, of Glee season three.”  He went on to note that the romantic setting and the music complemented the storyline and the situations perfectly.  But like I said, not a lot was said as far as the images on two men lying in bed together after having sex.  It is episodes like this one that leave the viewer’s talking about what happened in the show for days and months to come.  There are weaknesses in some episodes.  Sometimes the battle between Sue, the cheer leading coach, and Will the glee club coach, can be fairly draining and downright ridiculous.  And there are moments when the songs featured may not fit the overall tone of a particular episode.  Where Glee falls short, the fact that it has inspired young adults to embrace who they are, and that it has become a voice that could have brought to life the reality in gay and lesbian relationships is something to congratulate.  

In my home, Glee nights are set aside every week (mostly due to my teenage girls).  I do follow some of the stars of the show on Twitter, and I have pulled up their fan pages on Facebook.  Some may not have heard, but one of the stars, Cory Monteith, passed away over this last weekend.  I first heard of the news on Twitter. 

Glee became an overnight sensation when it first aired on May 19th, 2009.  There was nothing like it on cable.  “The First Time” pushed the envelope even farther, and I applaud the directors and creator of the show for their bold take on this very controversial issue!  We, as a society, are one step closer to ending the stigma that surround the intimacy shared between two men who are in love. 







-Advertisements-
The advertising that surrounds Glee on a regular Thursday evening are specifically geared to the target audience and demographic the creators and producers of the show were looking to reach.  The teenage and young adult population is a prime audience for selling all kinds of higher end, but not as expensive products to.   I will not be walking through every ad I saw throughout this episode of Glee.  Commercials are not super exciting to watch, and even less exciting to write about.  I will, however, highlight the trends I noticed when I watched this episode.

COVER GIRL!  I saw a few different Cover Girl ads during this show; not only Cover Girl, but also Maybelline.  If you are not familiar, these are make-up companies that are geared toward young adult women.  I also noticed that one of the newest cover girls is Lea Michele, one of the main stars in the show Glee. Cover Girl is an inexpensive make up, but it is very popular among this age group.

I also noticed a few commercials geared toward men, and particularly middle aged, middle class men.  The commercial that repeated itself twice was for a car rental company.  This portrayed a white, middle aged male in a business suit that was looking to rent a car on his business trip.  I feel like this was not aimed at the target audience, but for the parents of the target audience.  It’s a clever way to get a consumers attention.  There are Daughters out there making her parents sit down and watch her favorite show, and the networks accounted for this by slipping in a Progressive ad, or a Travelocity ad here and there. 

I also would like to mention that there is some advertising done on the show itself.  Sue Sylvester, one of the main characters who is an older, bitter, cheer leading coach wears her Adidas track suit in EVERY EPISODE!  This is no accident.  It’s a clever hook that the character has, but there is also a contract between Glee and Adidas that keeps that track suit in the show.  There are always small things you can notice on a television show that is known as “hidden advertisements”.  Keep your eyes peeled when watching your favorite shows.  A general rule is, if the label of something is showing on the show, then it’s an advertisement.

-RELATED LINKS-
http://www.cnn.com/2013/05/28/us/same-sex-marriage-fast-facts 

http://gleefan.com/